Category Archives: News

G.R.L. Screening at MoMA – May 4th

Come see the the Graffiti Research Lab‘s DVD which draws sordid connections between the Graffiti Research Lab and the Anti-Advertising Agency. The back story of the AAA/GRL collaboration, Light Criticism, will be exposed, as well as an inside view of the Aqua Teen Boston Terror Meltdown of 2007 you’ll never see elsewhere!

Anti-Advertising Agency cohorts, the Graffiti Research Lab are premiering their “Complete First Season” as part of PopRally at the Museum of Modern Art on May 4th @ 8PM + PARTY after with Javelin and special guests.

A panel after the film include Evan Roth, James Powderly, Steve Lambert, Bennett4$enate, and surprise guests.

GET TICKETS NOW

(P.S. if you know command line wizardry, how to concat and use parity files, the whole DVD can be downloaded from our server 50mb at a time. Otherwise it’s on Pirate Bay.)

Official Announcement after the jump: Read More »

Posted in News | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The Cute Boy on the CTA

It’s my birthday today, so of course I’m off to the amazing Polish salt caves of northern Chicago with my friend Liz, and I’m therefore gonna forgo the whole critical engagement with the ad industry thing and just tell you a story.

So a couple days ago, I was riding the train, when a super cute boy got on with a camera, and started obsessively taking pictures of the grocery store-chain advertisement directly above my head. So I said,

Why, hello.

But because he had some kind of personal music player going, he totally did not hear me. And then after about 57 more pictures, he took the earphones out of his ears and said,

What?

I said, You just took practically a whole roll of film of that ad. Why?

He said, Oh. God. It is so dumb. I work for the ad department of the CTA, and that’s a new ad, and I have to document it.

You did a pretty good job, I told him.

Yeah. I eat, sleep, and breathe ads. Seriously.

Oh, ha ha, I said. So do I. But kinda by accident.

I hate it. Hate it. Fucking hate it. Hate it.

Ummm, I said.

And then he stormed off to take more pictures in a different car of the train.

Posted in News | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Steve Lambert with Alan Abel and Ron English

I’ll be giving a short talk for part of Gelf Magazine’s Non-Motivational Speaker series. If you haven’t seen Abel Raises Cain, it’s great. And Ron English you’ve probably seen already. From Gelf’s site:

Culture jammers and pranksters will be this month’s topic. Featured speakers are Alan Abel, perhaps the most infamous prankster in American prank history, subject of the recent award-winning documentary, Abel Raises Cain, and “founder” of mock citizens’ groups The Society for the Indecency to Naked Animals and Citizens Against Breastfeeding; Steve Lambert, guerrilla artist, founder of The Anti-Advertising Agency, and Senior Fellow at cutting-edge arts organization Eyebeam NYC; and Ron English, patriarch of the agit-pop art movement, corporate branding subversive, and subject of the documentary “POPaganda: The Art and Crimes of Ron English.”

The event will start at 8 pm on April 24th at the Happy Ending Lounge, and is free.

Event Details:

Happy Ending Lounge (official site, CitySearch, MySpace)
302 Broome St.

(between Forsyth and Eldridge)
212-334-9676
J/M/Z/F to Delancey
B/D to Grand Street
Look for the hot-pink awning with the words “Health Club” on it.

Doors open at 7:30.
Readings start at 8 sharp.
FREE!

Posted in News | Tagged , , , , | 1 Response

No Lo Necesitas

You Don’t Need It, en español. Already on their way to Barcelona and Peru. This sticker accompanies our english version, and english stencil version.

As always, available FREE – just send a self addressed stamped envelope to:

The Anti-Advertising Agency
c/o Eyebeam
540 W. 21st St.
New York, NY 10011

We’re relocating! Will be out of touch through mid September 2010. After that we’ll start to be available again to give these away. Please subscribe to out RSS feed and check back later.

I can put 5 in an envelope without an extra stamp. If you want more, send extra stamps. If you want to send a little donation too, that’s fine – we’ll use them to make a whole new sticker that’s in the works. If you want the english version, I still have some I can send out and they are always free. All I ask is that you send me back some photos of where you placed them.

Care to print your own? You’ll want this EPS file. For printing we use Sticker Guy and VGKids because they’re punks and they’re a deal.

Posted in News | Tagged , , , | 8 Responses

Murketing: Absolut international incident?

from R. Walker at Murketing:

Strange Maps, via The Plank:

This map, used in a Mexican ad campaign, shows what the US-Mexican border would look like in an ‘absolut’ (i.e. perfect) world: a large part of the US’s west is annexed to Mexico.

Needless to say this map made its way to ‘El Norte’, annoying and upsetting many Americans – even leading to calls for a boycott of the Swedish-made vodka. What must be particularly annoying is that this map has some basis in fact.

The Plank also points to the reaction of someone named Michelle Malkin:

The advertising firm that created the Absolut Reconquista ad is Teran/TBWA. Teran is based in Mexico City. The company’s website boasts a pretentious statement of philosophy advocating “disruption” as a “tool for change” and “agent of growth.” (Scroll your mouse over the little buttons in the upper-right margin.) The firm advocates “overturning assumptions and prejudices that get in the way of imagining new possibilities and visionary ideas that help create a larger share of the future.”

Translation: The company advocates overturning borders that get in the way of imagining new maps of North America that help Mexico create a larger share of the continent.

Well. Two things.

First: An ad agency with a pretentious mission statement full of doublespeak clichés about change and disruption? No way! Say it isn’t so! That’s never happened before!

Second: Like every other agency, what these marketing pros “advocate” is getting paid by their clients. The way they get paid by their clients is to get their clients talked about and noticed. And that was Absolut-ly the goal here. Ad agencies don’t have a political motive. They have a profit motive.

Lifted entirely from R. Walker’s Murketing blog. (Thanks Rob!)

Also posted in Articles | 2 Responses

Branded Event Radicalizes Mommy Bloggers

An exclusive branded vacation/soiree intended for some mommy bloggers—but not others—succeeded this week in raising some questions about transparency, PR, and free shit. Not, surely, the kind of buzz the fancy party was intended to start.

The party was thrown by market giant Johnson & Johnson. The location was DisneyLand, owned by the Disney Company, long controller of the lion’s share of all youth media and licensed products. And the initial questions (paraphrased) were these:

Why didn’t I get invited? Who did get invited? If I complain about not getting invited, is there a chance I won’t be invited next year? If enough of us complain about not getting invited, will they even have one next year? If I continue to voice my opinion about the divisiveness this exclusive party causes my community, will the companies involved stop sending me products for review? If the free flow of stuff gets cut off because I’m voicing my opinion, how will that affect me as a blogger, whose solitary tool, after all, is my opinion?

Soon the questions (taken from comments to the Queen of Spain blog post above) became more pointed and funnier—not to mention angrier:

“What if companies don’t think [voicing our opinions about the DisneyLand gathering is] fair? If it makes them want to run away? If they think we are the “meanest mommies in the whole wide world”?”

“Are you seriously trying to backhandedly threaten me, and imply Disney doesn’t need Moms? Are you telling me Johnson and Johnson doesn’t need Moms to buy their baby shampoo too? Maybe they will market J&J babywash to single males instead??”

“I am the first to admit I want an open and transparent partnership with companies that come a courtin’. But I want it at market value. If my market is *women online*, what’s the value?”

Now I’m not terribly comfortable with most mommy blogs—for the same exact reasons that corporations like Johnson & Johnson and Disney would target them: those people are really busy, and apt to make expedient decisions. This probably is OK in the case of a drooly baby finger in uncomfortable proximity to an electrical outlet, but doesn’t really promote the deliberate approach I like to see in, say, my firefighters. My politicians. Or my cultural critics.

When we add in the economic incentive presented by the free stuff mommy bloggers get, we must view it in context: Women here in Illinois still earn only $.71 to every dollar earned by men. They still conduct a disproportionate amount of housework and, by far, carry the bulk of all babies born in the US every year. Who, by the way, we have few working national programs to help deal with the care, health, and early education of, once outside of the womb. Plus, remember, they’re busy.

Combined, these factors make something of a perfect storm—of free advertising. Because study after study after study has shown that if you take enough away from a subject, and then give that subject an item, that subject will like that item. It’s science!

Check this testimony, from Lady Bug and Blogging Mama:
“I am a very passionate individual and blogging is an excellent way for me to make a positive difference and if you didn’t already know, introduce products to people.” (She also runs a product review blog called Mum’s the Wurd, and need I say it? All reviews are enthusiastically uncritical.)

But the more these women start questioning the value of free speech only granted when all utterances are positive, the more they’ll start investigating the actual value of the work they do as advertisers—$45 per hour, by the way, Queen of Spain. Hopefully, they’ll start to value their potential as critics—and keepers of culture—too. ( Relaxed Homeskool and Work it, Mom! do already.)

These women are questioning their given role in culture as consumers. Weirdly, it’s the ones with proven reproductive capabilities leading the way.

p.s. My friends at InCUBATE are curating a show in Pittsburgh for my birthday next week: Other Options looks at artist groups who are re-interpreting, altering and creating infrastructure that affect their everyday lives and artistic practice. The runs through May 2nd at Goods & Services, 2628 E. Carson Street, South Side, and the opening’s 6-9 p.m. Friday April 11. No presents, please.

Posted in News | Tagged , , , , | 7 Responses

Good Signs from Ray Beldner

Ray Beldner: The Word on the Street
March 28- June 14, 2008 at the San Jose Institute of Contemporary Art

Ray Beldner Neon Sign

From the exhibition description:

The Word on the Street, neon signs by Ray Beldner, is an installation in the gallery’s front windows at 560 South First Street. The Word on the Street is part of the ICA’s “Night Moves” installation series, an innovative program that gives the ICA a nighttime presence and animates the downtown cultural landscape by showcasing after-dark programming in the gallery’s windows.

Ray Beldner uses language from homeless signs to make poetic neon versions that reflect sentiments of our own shortcomings, losses and desires. An expert in appropriation and unexpected collaborations, Beldner’s work in part pays homage to Bruce Nauman’s famous neon sign, The True Artist Helps the World by Revealing Mystic Truths. Responding to this statement, Beldner reveals human truths written by homeless individuals he has met on the street. Twisting what one would expect in a neon window display, Beldner’s signs cleverly reflect on what it means to be an artist and a human.

via SJICA

Posted in News | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Clear Channel Messed with LA Weekly and Lost!

by Jill Stewart at the LA Weekly

Recently, reporter Christine Pelisek asked the Los Angeles Department of Building and Safety for a list of all legal and illegal billboards in L.A. – an embarrassing document that will show the public all 11,000 “points of blight” allowed on local streets by City Attorney Rocky Delgadillo, Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and the Los Angeles City Council – in an era when other cities are removing and banning billboards.

Maybe we shouldn’t have been so shocked, given Villaraigosa’s view of what constitutes quality of life, when Building and Safety officials, instead of giving Pelisek this public information, instead alerted Clear Channel and its lawyers that the Weekly had asked City Hall for its billboards list.

That’s right, Villaraigosa’s bureaucrats in Building and Safety actually informed on us to a very big, very aggressive, very rich billboard company. Tattled. Squealed.

This morning, Clear Channel and another huge billboard profiteer, CBS, took the city to Superior Court to stop the cowed bureaucrats over at Building and Safety from even thinking about giving the Weekly the list of existing illegal and legal billboards in L.A.

Clear Channel lost in court today.

When our lawyer, Walt Sadler, and the city’s lawyer, Steve Blau, appeared in court this morning to protest Clear Channel’s effort to squelch this information, Judge James Chalfant quickly made clear that the location and ownership of billboards in L.A. – no matter the endless excuses given in the past by Delgadillo, Villaraigosa and the City Council – is public information gleaned from a public permitting process.

It is not proprietary information, as stratospherically expensive lawyers like Laura Brill from Irell & Manella, representing Clear Channel, like to claim when trying to keep this information from Los Angeles residents. Now, Building and Safety must release the list of 11,000 billboards, their owners and locations. By April 4. Including the thousands of billboards put up illegally by many billboard companies.

This is information that Los Angeles’ dozens of Neighborhood Councils and anti-blight activists have long been waiting for. But Clear Channel has a history of suing to interminably delay fearful City Hall officials from doing the right thing. So stay tuned.

via LA Weekly’s blog

Posted in News | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

New and Improved

I put a new coat of paint on the Anti-Advertising Agency website (did you notice?) last week. Agency projects are now listed over to the left. What started as a place to document our work a few years ago has expanded to a forum for news, thoughts, and ideas about subjects related to the Agency — also known as our blog. These blog items over time are developing into a handy resource. I hope it’s useful to you as well. On the right you’ll see a new addition, tags, which will make it easier to find related posts as the collection of information grows.

Keep an eye out for new contributors as well as seeing regular posts from Anne Elizabeth Moore.

Would you like to be a writer for the Anti-Advertising Agency site? To become a regular contributer to our blog send an email with some information about yourself, why you’d like to contribute, and what you’d like to cover to: steve at antiadvertisingagency.com.

Posted in News | Leave a comment

Article on Rami Tabello of IllegalSigns.CA

If you haven’t checked out IllegalSigns.CA yet, Rami Tabello is the man behind the removal of dozens of illegal billboards in Toronto.

From IllegalSigns.CA:

Humber College’s Convergence Magazine has published this article [PDF] about IllegalSigns.ca. It breaks a bit of new ground with the following quotes:

“The billboard lobby is a very powerful lobby,they do a lot of schmoozing of councilors,” concedes Toronto Councillor Howard Moscoe. “The billboard industry makes millions and millions of dollars off their affairs and can afford to hire people to lobby for them. Of course, councillors, we’re supposed to be immune from all that.”

“It’s turned the issue into a circus and has reduced the Toronto-East York community council into a council with a fetish about signs, rather than one dealing with development and other issues that are far more important than signs,” says Toronto City Councillor Kyle Rae.

Convergence Magazine Story

Also posted in Articles | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

With billboards, cities are facing the digital decision

By Patricia Lowry, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

photo by Pam Panchak/Post-Gazette

Ah, for the good old days, when billboards were merely a blight you could avoid, sort of, by averting your eyes.

Now the outdoor advertising companies have us right where they want us: stuck in traffic or at a red light, facing a digital sign that changes about every seven seconds. At least at home, zombied out in front of our televisions, we get a little programming with our digital ads. With digital billboards, we just get ads.

“We’re there 24-7,” Clear Channel Outdoor chief executive Paul Meyer told the Washington Post last year. “There’s no mute button, no on-off switch, no changing the station.”

He says that like it’s a good thing.

And for the billboard industry, it’s a very good thing, as the fast-changing ads are bringing booming profits.

But for the rest of us — those who do not own billboard companies or have stock in them or accept money from them to fund our political campaigns — digital billboards represent a significant ratcheting up of the industry’s assault on the American landscape. Read More »

Posted in News | Tagged , , , | 4 Responses

Trojan Horse

Recently back from Cambodia, welcome back to the AAA, Anne Elizabeth Moore!

The great Facebook Ad Debate of November 2007 centered entirely on whether it would work—meaning, would people who did not buy certain products before alter their spending patterns now?—and whether or not it would change advertising forever—meaning, are online social advertising networks the magic elixir that will convince people to shop outside their comfort zones? The company behind the scheme, Lookery, was heralded a godsend, the answer: finally someone had discovered a way to monetize social networking!

Last week, though, Lookery hit its billionth impression some three weeks ahead of schedule. Few celebrated: No financial returns were reported. Facebook’s exponential growth—550% since 2005—has yet to be monetized after all.

After small concerns were voiced over non-issues like “privacy” and “criminality,” (can we really ask a for-profit company to respect boundaries our own government will not?) the Facebook ad programs, Beacon and Social Ads, went opt-in, allowing users to sign on as “fans” of certain goods and services. (These are usually brands, products, or in the case of the dancing Sprite can everyone was so excited about last fall, single advertising images.) Then, users navigate the site greeted only by banner ads for those goods and services that might appeal to the Facebook identity they had created, even receiving alerts when an online pal visits a site they like.

Certainly, the system better targeted ads to individual viewers, and therefore seemed more responsive to specific needs and interests. It did seem a gift of sorts. “It’s a brilliant Trojan Horse . . . a natural evolution, both advertiser-friendly and user-friendly,” one CEO told Advertising Age at the time.

But now that we know that Lookery’s great gift seems to consist only of an increase in the number of things potential consumers can mindlessly click on, we can peer inside the Trojan Horse to find . . . nothing. Not, at least for the Facebook users who signed up, providing free labor to big brands in exchange for association with the shiny corporations. Do keep in mind that this is a service users provide freely that, when called by its technical name “marketing,” nets a salary of almost $45 per hour.

Labor issues aside, the gift of monetized social networking doesn’t seem to contribute much to the stockhouse of information about marketing either, as publicly consumed goods and services popular in the real world, like the New York Times and Sprite, also appear to be popular virtually.

So this Trojan Horse isn’t all that effective. But it may still be destructive.

Those of us who track the advancement of media conglomeration and have watched it intersect with social networks weren’t surprised by Facebook Ads—or any of the other similar ad schemes developed (many by Lookery) for any of the other social networking sites. Of course new means of monetizing relationships between the many will be explored to mine profits for the few. What else could possibly be behind the recent major media interest (NewCorp with MySpace, and MSNBC here) in connecting online? Moves like this clearly target the coveted youth demographic, often so enchanted by the technology of new hang-out options and advanced peer-pressure delivery systems that they fail to heed warnings dutifully provided by teachers, librarians, and cool aunties about real-life internet predators.

It’s a Trojan Horse we saw being wheeled down the road from several miles away: for-profit companies want to place value on our friendships and our associations with their products. They want to profit from them. Without paying us for our labor.

There is a hidden surprise in the Trojan Horse analogy, though, so kindly provided by the CEO: we finally have open acknowledgment that marketers and advertisers have declared war upon us regular folk. So far our response has been to remain open and curious about whatever gifts they wheel inside our gates, but it’s coming time to stop accepting them.

Posted in News | Tagged , | 9 Responses

Clear Channel: Digital Billboards Rented, Not Hacked

The Los Angeles street artist known as Skullphone managed to get his iconic skull-holding-a-cellphone image to display on 10 prominent digital billboards throughout Los Angeles last week — leading some blogs to report that hed hacked into the signs. Alas, Clear Channel Outdoors, which owns the billboards, says no. "He paid to get it up," says spokeswoman Jennifer Gery. "It only ran for two days."
Clear Channel: Digital Billboards Rented, Not Hacked | Threat Level from Wired.com

The hack was a hoax.  booooo.

I was genuinely excited there could have been a vulnerability that would put such a powerful communications medium into the hands of smart and determined people. But it’s still pay to say in the land of free speech. +1 for the cynics.

Posted in News | Tagged , | 2 Responses

Advertising Scofflaw Assaults NYT Reporter

From the New York Times’ David W. Dunlap, dated March 27, 2008:

The takeover of public space for commercial promotion may be offensive, but it is usually legal. Occasionally, however, it is not. On Friday, March 14, it bordered on the criminal.

That’s where I come in. I was the victim.

As a Times reporter, I tend to focus quickly on illegal marketing campaigns…. So I sensed a story on the evening of the 14th, when I came across two or three young men stapling posters for a new hip-hop album to lampposts, traffic signs and sidewalk scaffolding on Broadway, between 21st and 22nd Streets.

It is unlawful, the city’s administrative code says, for anyone to “attach or affix by any means whatsoever any handbill, poster, notice, sign” on lampposts, traffic signs and sign poles or “other such item or structure in any street.” signsThe sign-hanging team would place stacks of posters in wastebaskets at the street corners, then draw from that supply to cover nearby street fixtures.

I began photographing the poster operation. After about two minutes, one man asked me why I was taking pictures. “Because what you’re doing is illegal,” I replied. He answered, “Breaking cameras is illegal, too, but if you don’t stop taking pictures, I’ll break your camera.” He modified “camera” with an adjective I am not permitted to repeat here. I identified myself as a reporter from The Times. “I’ll break your camera,” he said, using that adjective again, “and you can print that in your paper.”

I distinctly remember thinking, “No, I can’t.” Then, rather than antagonize him further, I started taking pictures of the poster-covered scaffold pipes across Broadway.

The approach came so swiftly, I cannot even say whether it was from in front or behind. But I do remember a furious face inches away from mine as the man said he had warned me not to take any more pictures. The next few minutes are — as they say — a blur. I was suddenly on my back on the sidewalk, near the curb, trying to hold on to my camera and fend off my assailant, with my right leg pressed against his chest.

Read more…Illegal Signs and a Reporters Broken Camera – City Room – Metro – New York Times Blog

Note: Not to discourage you from trying to stop illegal advertising as it happens. Remember, when you see illegal ads call 311, if you see it happening in progress, call 911. It might seem extreme, but the laws for graffiti are extreme.

Also posted in Articles | Tagged , | 1 Response

Watch Out Dr. Zizmor

Admittedly, I’m a little late to the game on this. Apparently it circled the design world last month when the Anti-Advertising Agency’s graphic designer, Adam Connelly, first sent this to me. Regardless, page through the 5 different templates on Design-Police, download and print on sticker paper, and start talking back to those poorly designed ads.

Design Police

Also, check out these sticker projects:
The Bubble Project
Cancelled Stickers
Corporate Vandals Not Welcome
and
Our own You Don’t Need It sticker (which are free by the way) and the EPS file if you want to print your own.

Posted in News | Tagged , , | 1 Response