Submit to the Research Blog
Know of a great article, video, photo to submit to the site? Just completed a project you think should be shared with our readers?
Related Posts
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Pathik on Bus Stop Bench Project
- John on Product Placement “oppertunity” from adamkluger@inbox.com
- Steve Lambert on Light Criticism
- Chuck on Light Criticism
- Girl in the Photo on Portland Summer Advertising Smorgasbord
-
Most Popular of All-Time
- Oprah, baby, please let me DeTouch you… 26731 view(s)
- …The greatest love of all 9335 view(s)
- New Lauren Greenfield video on NY Times 4447 view(s)
- The Illusionists » Annals of Offensive Advertising: Nikon 4207 view(s)
- You Don’t Need It – Stickers 3574 view(s)
Tag cloud
public space chicago humor aaaproject history ads everywhere los angeles art sticker online outdoor san francisco nyc thingsthatmakeyousayhmmmmm not creative the law social marketing free bad deals grl AAAFFF prank consumer resistance you don't need it how to video tv billboard politics brands marketing hack ad creep poster haha graffiti china illegal advertising self-loathing greenwashing justfollowingorders taxes branding toronto add-art

Sorry Amber, for Calif. Republicans you’re just not as important as this precious, precious money.
The L.A. Times is reporting Clear Channel has its eye on 674 state owned digital billboards on California Highways. The billboards were installed to alert drivers to road hazards and for Amber Alerts providing “urgent bulletins in the most serious child-abduction cases.”
But now the state is listening to Clear Channel.
Apparently California needs money. In the Governor’s budget it says, “chronic underinvestment has increased congestion and has resulted in California having some of the most distressed highway and road conditions in the United States.”
Of course, this is the neo-liberal fantasy:
I can’t imagine this proposal going very far, but the whining about being broke and the publicity that follows may be intended to prepare voters for a comparatively less disgusting option.
As argued in the L.A. Times story, yes it’s an eyesore, yes it might be dangerous to drivers, yes it will train people pay less attention to a sign designed to help abducted children and tell them about emergencies – thereby nearly nullifying it. But more important that that, it’s public space and public property that belongs to us, not corporations.
But perhaps you’re more fiscally minded. This is another bad deal made by politicians with advertising and marketing companies. (Politicians who are most likely being lobbied by and receiving campaign donations from Clear Channel.) Sen. George Runner (R-Lancaster) says the money will be used for highway repair and _potentially_ may be “tens of millions of dollars.” The California Transportation Commission’s annual budget is $28,466,000,000.
Another drop in the bucket. Sorry Amber.
Thanks for the tip from reader Sam.