Related Posts
Our Most Popular Posts
Tag cloud
sticker grl los angeles prank brands bad deals greenwashing branding you don't need it aaaproject social marketing china san francisco free chicago humor the law taxes illegal advertising art how to marketing outdoor haha online justfollowingorders ads everywhere consumer resistance toronto add-art not creative thingsthatmakeyousayhmmmmm billboard video politics ad creep public space self-loathing AAAFFF nyc hack poster tv history graffiti-
This Weeks Popular Posts
- ...The greatest love of all 3 comment(s)
- You Don't Need It - Stickers 46 comment(s)
- Live active culture! 2 comment(s)
- Bus Stop Bench Field Report 11 comment(s)
- "Montauk Monster" is a "Marketing Monster?" 2 comment(s)
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Ronnie on “But Advertising is Free Speech…”
- links for 2009-12-10 on Spam Infographics
- Taking the City Back | Tony Medeiros on NY Street Art Takeover Mini Documentary
- New York Street Advertising Takeover, Painting Over Illegal Billboards With Original Art on NY Street Art Takeover Mini Documentary
- Michael Mandiberg on Exactly what are you selling me?

Sorry Amber, for Calif. Republicans you’re just not as important as this precious, precious money.
The L.A. Times is reporting Clear Channel has its eye on 674 state owned digital billboards on California Highways. The billboards were installed to alert drivers to road hazards and for Amber Alerts providing “urgent bulletins in the most serious child-abduction cases.”
But now the state is listening to Clear Channel.
Apparently California needs money. In the Governor’s budget it says, “chronic underinvestment has increased congestion and has resulted in California having some of the most distressed highway and road conditions in the United States.”
Of course, this is the neo-liberal fantasy:
I can’t imagine this proposal going very far, but the whining about being broke and the publicity that follows may be intended to prepare voters for a comparatively less disgusting option.
As argued in the L.A. Times story, yes it’s an eyesore, yes it might be dangerous to drivers, yes it will train people pay less attention to a sign designed to help abducted children and tell them about emergencies – thereby nearly nullifying it. But more important that that, it’s public space and public property that belongs to us, not corporations.
But perhaps you’re more fiscally minded. This is another bad deal made by politicians with advertising and marketing companies. (Politicians who are most likely being lobbied by and receiving campaign donations from Clear Channel.) Sen. George Runner (R-Lancaster) says the money will be used for highway repair and _potentially_ may be “tens of millions of dollars.” The California Transportation Commission’s annual budget is $28,466,000,000.
Another drop in the bucket. Sorry Amber.
Thanks for the tip from reader Sam.