Submit to the Research Blog
Know of a great article, video, photo to submit to the site? Just completed a project you think should be shared with our readers?
Related Posts
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Pathik on Bus Stop Bench Project
- John on Product Placement “oppertunity” from adamkluger@inbox.com
- Steve Lambert on Light Criticism
- Chuck on Light Criticism
- Girl in the Photo on Portland Summer Advertising Smorgasbord
-
Most Popular of All-Time
- Oprah, baby, please let me DeTouch you… 26735 view(s)
- …The greatest love of all 9339 view(s)
- New Lauren Greenfield video on NY Times 4487 view(s)
- The Illusionists » Annals of Offensive Advertising: Nikon 4221 view(s)
- You Don’t Need It – Stickers 3590 view(s)
Tag cloud
brands humor sticker tv not creative video poster ad creep how to add-art outdoor taxes hack greenwashing toronto you don't need it grl free los angeles ads everywhere haha bad deals AAAFFF billboard marketing art san francisco online history thingsthatmakeyousayhmmmmm illegal advertising graffiti prank consumer resistance justfollowingorders china social marketing self-loathing the law branding nyc aaaproject chicago public space politics

Smart License Plates: A Very Dumb Idea?
via Ban Billboard Blight
Do you think the idea of California license plates than can show electronic ads is:
1. A great idea, about time.
2. Possibly questionable, but let’s study it.
3. One of the top ten worst ideas of all time.
If you answered yes to #1, don’t bother reading further. If you answered yes to #2, you’re in line with 25 California State Senators who voted to do just that, study the idea. If you answered yes to #3, you can spend the rest of the day (or evening) pondering how woefully befuddled those legislators are to even spend a minute contemplating the idea.
The perpetrator-in-chief is Los Angeles area Senator Curren Price, who apparently sniffs some revenue for a state in perpetual budget crisis as well as perpetual paralysis between cutting spending and raising taxes. How much revenue? Who knows? In numerous news articles on the subject, Price is quoted as saying that he’s only proposing a study of the idea, and that the study will not be funded by the state? Huh? Who will fund it, then? And how will that affect the objectivity of the study’s conclusions?
Here’s the legislative analysis of the proposal. And below is one of the TV news pieces on the issue, with pros (gulp) and cons.