Related Posts
Our Most Popular Posts
Tag cloud
haha nyc hack consumer resistance the law taxes you don't need it grl how to social marketing brands graffiti self-loathing poster history toronto chicago prank marketing billboard public space san francisco bad deals thingsthatmakeyousayhmmmmm AAAFFF ads everywhere branding politics justfollowingorders online greenwashing aaaproject video outdoor tv humor china free add-art ad creep illegal advertising art not creative sticker los angeles-
This Weeks Popular Posts
- ...The greatest love of all 3 comment(s)
- You Don't Need It - Stickers 46 comment(s)
- Live active culture! 2 comment(s)
- Bus Stop Bench Field Report 11 comment(s)
- "Montauk Monster" is a "Marketing Monster?" 2 comment(s)
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Ronnie on “But Advertising is Free Speech…”
- links for 2009-12-10 on Spam Infographics
- Taking the City Back | Tony Medeiros on NY Street Art Takeover Mini Documentary
- New York Street Advertising Takeover, Painting Over Illegal Billboards With Original Art on NY Street Art Takeover Mini Documentary
- Michael Mandiberg on Exactly what are you selling me?

Public Ad Campaign: Should OAC’s Be Subject To The Same Penalties Grafitti Writers Face?
Should Outdoor Advertising Companies Be Subject To The Same Penalties Grafitti Writers Face?
BC Biermann, a PhD Assistant Professor of Film/Media Studies California Baptist University – Riverside has recently published a paper on “Spatial Distributions of Power: Illegal Billboards as Graffiti in Los Angeles.” In it he argues…
“While graffiti has regularly been prosecuted as form of vandalism, illegal billboards have not. Illegal billboards are generally defined as panels for the display of advertisements in public places (such as alongside highways or on the sides of buildings) that have not received the legal permits and safety inspections; panels that display ads not related to structure or property they are affixed to may also quality as “unlawful.” It is my contention that illegal billboards are a form of graffiti and, as a result, should be prosecuted as a form of vandalism.”
In this paper, Mr. Biermann comes to some conclusions that have informed our practice here at PublicAdCampaign for years. In fact, he calls upon the NYSAT project (without credit) as an example of civil disobedience that attempts to challenge commercial control of public messages while promoting a more just public arena, interested in promoting individual identity and citizen directed spatial control.
I highly suggest reading the paper, but if you don’t have the time, I’ll leave you with the final 2 sentences.
In this way, via a constant bombardment of a hegemonic truth, corpo-political regimes control the means by which individuals seek to know, decipher, and act on themselves. Acting as if they were free in within a liberal, democratic system of rule, the good consumer citizen is calculatedly and spatially constructed.
Indeed, this is truly about who we are and who we want to be as people and a society. When our influences come from the corporate machine, we have a hard time defining for ourselves the truths with which we would like to live.
via Public Ad Campaign: Should OAC’s Be Subject To The Same Penalties Grafitti Writers Face?.