Submit to the Research Blog
Know of a great article, video, photo to submit to the site? Just completed a project you think should be shared with our readers?
Related Posts
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Pathik on Bus Stop Bench Project
- John on Product Placement “oppertunity” from adamkluger@inbox.com
- Steve Lambert on Light Criticism
- Chuck on Light Criticism
- Girl in the Photo on Portland Summer Advertising Smorgasbord
-
Most Popular of All-Time
- Oprah, baby, please let me DeTouch you… 26737 view(s)
- …The greatest love of all 9340 view(s)
- New Lauren Greenfield video on NY Times 4492 view(s)
- The Illusionists » Annals of Offensive Advertising: Nikon 4221 view(s)
- You Don’t Need It – Stickers 3590 view(s)
Tag cloud
bad deals taxes public space san francisco AAAFFF graffiti china haha hack los angeles history politics thingsthatmakeyousayhmmmmm branding marketing chicago social marketing prank how to you don't need it nyc art online poster greenwashing brands billboard free ads everywhere self-loathing add-art outdoor video justfollowingorders tv sticker aaaproject humor ad creep illegal advertising the law toronto consumer resistance not creative grl

The Secret Lives of Big Pharma’s ‘Thought Leaders’ – The Chronicle Review – The Chronicle of Higher Education
In the early 1970s, a group of medical researchers decided to study an unusual question. How would a medical audience respond to a lecture that was completely devoid of content, yet delivered with authority by a convincing phony? To find out, the authors hired a distinguished-looking actor and gave him the name Dr. Myron L. Fox. They fabricated an impressive CV for Dr. Fox and billed him as an expert in mathematics and human behavior. Finally, they provided him with a fake lecture composed largely of impressive-sounding gibberish, and had him deliver the lecture wearing a white coat to three medical audiences under the title “Mathematical Game Theory as Applied to Physician Education.” At the end of the lecture, the audience members filled out a questionnaire.
The responses were overwhelmingly positive. The audience members described Dr. Fox as “extremely articulate” and “captivating.” One said he delivered “a very dramatic presentation.” After one lecture, 90 percent of the audience members said they had found the lecture by Dr. Fox “stimulating.” Over all, almost every member of every audience loved Dr. Fox’s lecture, despite the fact that, as the authors write, it was delivered by an actor “programmed to teach charismatically and nonsubstantively on a topic about which he knew nothing.”
via The Secret Lives of Big Pharma’s ‘Thought Leaders’ – The Chronicle Review – The Chronicle of Higher Education.
Thanks Paul S.