This is smart. Super smart. It’s getting more and more rare to see an actual, honest to goodness guerilla campaign that involves both a surprise and an insight tied together with a purpose. Slapping decals on the hand-rests of escalators just isn’t enough anymore.

To bring some attention to ocean pollution and just how disgusting it really is, Surfrider Foundation teamed up with Satchi & Satchi LA to create “Catch of the Day.” Simply and brilliantly, they collected actual trash from beaches around the U.S., packaged it like food, and left it on display at farmer’s markets. It’s site-specific, appropriate, impacting, meaningful, shocking, and an actual consumer insight into the very act they’re in the middle of. Someone about to buy fish from the same ocean as the trash in their hands can’t help but be at least a little more enlightened as to how pollution isn’t someone else’s problem.

see more pictures – surfrider foundation: catch of the day. « shape+colour.

Is there a word for the irrational and/or rational fear of becoming the target of direct marketers?

Advertisaphobia? Adverphobia? Adphobia? Ad-phobia?

The folks at Tappening have released one of the funniest and smartest PSA-ish social education campaigns I’ve seen in a long time. Well, maybe since the New York Times Special Edition.

Reports are these cute single color posters with white lies about the bottled water industry will be hitting the streets of NYC soon, if they aren’t already up (I’m out of town for another week).

My favorite is “Bottled Water: 98% melted ice caps, 2% polar bear tears.” The small print at the bottom of the poster says: “If bottled water companies can lie, we can too.”

Their “Start a Lie” website is also killer. Anyone can add a lie about the bottled water industry, e.g.: “Bottled water makes me urinate fire.”

They also did these great ones during the Presidential election about McCain and Obama.

Awesome work!

Also, for any educators out there, this is practically a readymade course assignment for any art, design, social studies, activism course.

From Coolhunting, via Marisa Olson

Ironworkers spray paint names of young cancer patients onto the beams of the Yawkey Center going up at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute.  The building’s steel skeleton is now a brightly colored, seven-story monument to scores of children receiving treatment at the clinic.

from Boston.com, photo by David Ryan

Casual visitors to the Anti-Advertising Agency site might find it odd or incongruous that we take issue with advertising, and yet use advertising methods in our projects. But they misunderstand. It’s not the method as much as the content. The core methods used to speak to a broad audience in a language they understand are tremendously effective, and we have great respect for them. Advertising and marketing are only a subset of mass communication, but mass communication in general isn’t the problem.

In fact, the methods of advertising and marketing can be used to do great things. In the field of social marketing the methods of advertising are used to promote behavior for the social good.

The most familiar examples of social marketing we all know are public service announcements from the Ad Council like this one:

These are often seen late at night because television stations are required to run them by the FCC – but the hours are less specific. The AdCouncil messages might tell you what your brain would look like on drugs, or to drive your SUV safely. There are other organizations that get involved, like the mormons, who remind us to tell the truth or even the broadcasters themselves make “the more you know” style 15 second announcements.

I’m glad these exist, but there’s a lot of problems with them. Like how effective a NBC celebrity can be in creating positive change with a 12 second statement for example. Or that the AdCouncil’s work seems to be made by major agencies looking to boost employee morale with some charity work. And for a variety of reasons the AdCouncil’s work is rather safe: instead of “ride your bike and take public transit” the message is “drive safely” – wouldn’t want to offend those auto clients! And even the great stuff seems to run predominately at 2am instead of primetime.

When it’s good, it’s good

The AAA’s Adam Connelly was at an advertising conference in New York City and picked up this card:

This was distributed by an market research outfit called The Ministry of Culture. They’ve done work for everyone from Colt45, to Lexus, to American Express, and Scion. But for this project they have not revealed the client, beyond “the Nurse Family Trust.” My hunch is it’s a spec piece, done by the agency as a calling card.

What is it? A membership card for the Prudent Boozers “age-old secret society of bon vivants around the globe who have adopted the practice of [...] never quite finishing their third libation. Members often reach this point after enduring years of embarrassing shenanigans and poisonous hangovers induced by bacchanalian excess.” Seriously, check out their site.

The four floor program mentioned in the card above is to “savor the first drink, sip the 2nd, nurse the 3rd” and not quite finish it, thereby “skip the 4th.” This is the foundation of the concept and everything else is built around it.

Ok, so the secret society isn’t real. But who cares. Ministry of Culture has painstakingly created a whole society with a history, culture, and artifacts. The story is amusing and great, the message is fairly complete, and the concept encourages drinking in moderation.

But most if all, it’s fun.

I challenge you to find a non-commerical alchohol related PSA that isn’t serious, sober toned (sorry for the pun), and binary.

When alcohol companies take a stab at a “drink responsibly” message, at least it’s funnier and more palatable (does that count as a pun?) Let’s take a look:

I used the Errol Morris video because I think it’s stronger than most. However, this still works as an advertisement. Because that’s what it needs to be. A key part of this message is the brand. Take out the drink responsibly message and this could still be part of a successful ad campaign.

Prudent Boozers, on the other hand, can focus on the moderation message and spend time on it. They provide a “how-to” for drinking in moderation. They talk about the benefits, and the problems of doing otherwise. And they make it fun and kinda cool – you’re part of a club! There’s nothing very cool about the Errol Morris/Miller PSA (sorry Errol, I love the movies).

So what’s the angle here? If there’s an alcohol company behind this, I don’t want to know. I don’t believe there is, but don’t ever let me find out because it would ruin it. If it’s a spec piece – then it’s partly meant to draw attention to Ministry of Culture. But when the work is good, the creator deserves some credit, so I don’t mind. MoC, I don’t want to know what you did with Colt45, but bravo on this one.

Quit Your Jobs

This is just an example of the great non-commercial work advertisers and marketers are capable of when they put their minds to it. And there are non-commercial entities that can use that expertise. If you are a creative person working in advertising or marketing (I know you read this) and you know you could do more valuable things – QUIT YOUR JOB. We need your talent full-time in this world. There’s battles to be won and volunteering some spec pieces or working on a weak “drive safely” campaign wont be enough.

I know, total cliche’d title. Oh well.

I bought carbon offsets on a Continental flight. I particularly like the fact that you could choose your own science… and your own cost…

I really wonder about offsetting. For a while I thought of it as a useful costing mechanism. And planting trees is a barely useful short term mitigation, though repairing deforestation is always good. But I feel deeply cynical about it. Especially as greenmarketers send me email after email wanting to get their carbon offset product into my carbon plugin The Real Costs. It ads carbon footprint information to airplane and travel websites.

I had an email exchange recently about this with Mark Purdon a PhD Candidate in the Department of Political Science at University of Toronto. We also talked quite a bit about Carbon Taxes. I sent him this article from the NYTimes on why Carbon Tax is a tax you actually don’t want to have to collect.

Being a political scientist, he has a distinctly different viewpoint on these issues. It is interesting to see is approach. He says:

I agree, a carbon tax is great but politically difficult to implement. It’s actually a leading election issue in Canada now: see the opposition party (the Liberal’s) website on The Green Shift as well as the Green Party of Canada. My feeling here again is about costs: the tax starts out low but at a certain level people are going to start resenting it and pushing back. There’s really no reason we can’t do a carbon tax within a cap-and-trade system, with offsets to mop up what’s left over.

How do people behave is such an interesting question. It comes back to marketing and social marketing. I mean, we have such problems with tax marketing in the US. Republicans stand for lower taxes and Democrats stand for higher taxes, right? WRONG. They all tax, they just tax different people. Just look at this amazing graphic from ChartJunk:

Sadly, its all about the marketing.

Inflatable Polar Bears – Environmental Defense Fund – Very Short List

Bravo, the environmental defense fund appropriates street art and gets it right. Mass communication can be a powerful thing when not used to sell cars.

Oh advertising. Yes it can be shallow and harmful. But I have such great respect for it because the tools at work can be so effective – in social marketing for example. Which is part of the idea behind this whole AAA project. 

And those ideas seep into the other things I do. The same goes for Michael Mandiberg whose posts you see on this site.  We recently put those ideas to work on the Bright Idea Shade at the Eyebeam OpenLab.

Enjoy a video on the long weekend.

via simon jolly and boing boing

YouTube – Dothegreenthing.com: Tears Of A Cloud