Related Posts
- Sign Industry: “The Law is interfering with my illegal income!!”
- Oakland’s Ban on “Visual Blight” Upheld in Court
- Judge Says 2006 Lawsuit Settlement Allowing Digital Billboards in L.A. is Illegal, Calls Agreement Between City and Billboard Companies “Poison”
- Office Tenants Plagued by Series of Illegal Supergraphic Signs; Do the L.A. City Attorney and District Councilman Care?
- Billboard Companies Protest Billboard Tax…On Illegal Billboards – from Torontoist
Our Most Popular Posts
Tag cloud
not creative bad deals outdoor poster toronto los angeles hack public space AAAFFF you don't need it video justfollowingorders grl graffiti free billboard chicago tv san francisco marketing add-art history branding taxes humor thingsthatmakeyousayhmmmmm art ads everywhere social marketing self-loathing brands online aaaproject sticker greenwashing china prank the law consumer resistance haha ad creep how to nyc illegal advertising politics-
This Weeks Popular Posts
- ...The greatest love of all 3 comment(s)
- You Don't Need It - Stickers 46 comment(s)
- Live active culture! 2 comment(s)
- Bus Stop Bench Field Report 11 comment(s)
- "Montauk Monster" is a "Marketing Monster?" 2 comment(s)
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Ronnie on “But Advertising is Free Speech…”
- links for 2009-12-10 on Spam Infographics
- Taking the City Back | Tony Medeiros on NY Street Art Takeover Mini Documentary
- New York Street Advertising Takeover, Painting Over Illegal Billboards With Original Art on NY Street Art Takeover Mini Documentary
- Michael Mandiberg on Exactly what are you selling me?

Sign Companies, Property Owners, Advertising Agencies, Major Corporations Thumb Their Noses at L.A.’s New Off-Site Sign Ban
Almost a year after the L.A. City Council approved a moratorium on new off-site and supergraphic signs, and four months after it replaced that temporary measure with a permanent ban, advertisers and sign companies continue to wrap, hang, and otherwise display their multi-story supergraphic signs on the walls of buildings throughout the city.
So why are property owners and sign companies willing to risk open violation of the law, and advertising agencies and major corporations willing to look the other way? The answer is easy to surmise from the fact that a large supergraphic in a high-traffic location can generate upwards of $50,000 in monthly revenue, while the maximum fine for violating sign law provisions is $100 a day.
The City Attorney’s office has filed at least two civil suits under a public nuisance provision that allows fines of up to $2,500 a day, but those lawsuits are slowly moving through the courts and any resolution is likely to be months away, if not longer, depending upon appeals.
In the meantime, absent any sudden displays of social and civic responsibility on the part of the outdoor advertising industry, expect to see the city’s public spaces occupied by more and more of these huge sales pitches demanding the attention of everyone driving, walking, bicycling or otherwise moving past them.
via Sign Companies, Property Owners, Advertising Agencies, Major Corporations Thumb Their Noses at L.A.’s New Off-Site Sign Ban.