Submit to the Research Blog
Know of a great article, video, photo to submit to the site? Just completed a project you think should be shared with our readers?
Related Posts
- Office Tenants Plagued by Series of Illegal Supergraphic Signs; Do the L.A. City Attorney and District Councilman Care?
- Sign Industry: “The Law is interfering with my illegal income!!”
- Why It Matters (from Ban Billboard Blight)
- NYT: DoB Removes sign with 103 violation notices
- Billboard Companies Protest Billboard Tax…On Illegal Billboards – from Torontoist
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- touch + sight | celebrate your senses on Ad-Free Blog & Keep Your Day Job
- nagash on This Space Available
- Ashley Tumson on Office Tenants Plagued by Series of Illegal Supergraphic Signs; Do the L.A. City Attorney and District Councilman Care?
- Kandy Giles on Ad Lib Poster Project
- Pathik on Bus Stop Bench Project
-
Most Popular of All-Time
- Home 50,444 view(s)
- Oprah, baby, please let me DeTouch you… 28,156 view(s)
- …The greatest love of all 9,996 view(s)
- Our Brands, Ourselves 9,295 view(s)
- Our Mission 8,381 view(s)
Tag cloud
greenwashing the law china brands taxes thingsthatmakeyousayhmmmmm video justfollowingorders bad deals consumer resistance sticker ad creep chicago los angeles outdoor add-art politics hack haha graffiti branding humor self-loathing poster grl aaaproject san francisco toronto billboard you don't need it not creative history art ads everywhere tv online social marketing nyc AAAFFF prank illegal advertising how to marketing public space free

Sign Companies, Property Owners, Advertising Agencies, Major Corporations Thumb Their Noses at L.A.’s New Off-Site Sign Ban
Almost a year after the L.A. City Council approved a moratorium on new off-site and supergraphic signs, and four months after it replaced that temporary measure with a permanent ban, advertisers and sign companies continue to wrap, hang, and otherwise display their multi-story supergraphic signs on the walls of buildings throughout the city.
So why are property owners and sign companies willing to risk open violation of the law, and advertising agencies and major corporations willing to look the other way? The answer is easy to surmise from the fact that a large supergraphic in a high-traffic location can generate upwards of $50,000 in monthly revenue, while the maximum fine for violating sign law provisions is $100 a day.
The City Attorney’s office has filed at least two civil suits under a public nuisance provision that allows fines of up to $2,500 a day, but those lawsuits are slowly moving through the courts and any resolution is likely to be months away, if not longer, depending upon appeals.
In the meantime, absent any sudden displays of social and civic responsibility on the part of the outdoor advertising industry, expect to see the city’s public spaces occupied by more and more of these huge sales pitches demanding the attention of everyone driving, walking, bicycling or otherwise moving past them.
via Sign Companies, Property Owners, Advertising Agencies, Major Corporations Thumb Their Noses at L.A.’s New Off-Site Sign Ban.