Submit to the Research Blog
Know of a great article, video, photo to submit to the site? Just completed a project you think should be shared with our readers?
Related Posts
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Pathik on Bus Stop Bench Project
- John on Product Placement “oppertunity” from adamkluger@inbox.com
- Steve Lambert on Light Criticism
- Chuck on Light Criticism
- Girl in the Photo on Portland Summer Advertising Smorgasbord
-
Most Popular of All-Time
- Oprah, baby, please let me DeTouch you… 26735 view(s)
- …The greatest love of all 9339 view(s)
- New Lauren Greenfield video on NY Times 4486 view(s)
- The Illusionists » Annals of Offensive Advertising: Nikon 4221 view(s)
- You Don’t Need It – Stickers 3589 view(s)
Tag cloud
aaaproject history nyc china taxes the law prank social marketing branding bad deals illegal advertising san francisco free ads everywhere tv poster graffiti billboard chicago video grl sticker consumer resistance ad creep you don't need it public space los angeles thingsthatmakeyousayhmmmmm humor not creative AAAFFF politics self-loathing add-art brands toronto how to hack haha greenwashing art online justfollowingorders outdoor marketing

Public/Private Partnerships: Will Commercialization Save Our City Parks? | Ban Billboard Blight
A great post over at Ban Billboard Blight about the move to allow advertising in Los Angeles Public Parks.
Public/Private partnerships. At last week’s meeting of the L.A. City Council’s Budget and Finance Committee, the term kept bobbing like a life preserver grasped for by city agencies at risk of being drowned in a violent tide of red ink. Councilman Bill Rosendahl, speaking of the Recreation and Parks department, said that in the absence of such partnerships “we’re not going to be able to sustain our parks, it’s as simple as that.” The other committee members who spoke–Paul Koretz, Greig Smith, and Chairman Bernard Parks–all nodded assent to Rosendahl’s declaration, apparently feeling no need to examine either its truth or its implications for the city’s future.
That’s too bad, because Rosendahl’s statement amounts to embrace of the idea that a large, modern, wealthy city will have to go hat in hand to corporate boardrooms in order to provide one of the most public and democratic–and many would say, essential–services to its citizens. In the picture painted by the silver tongue of Barry Sanders, the retired corporate lawyer and president of the Recreation and Parks Commission, this means some signs in the parks thanking Wells Fargo and Ralph’s and Taco Bell and whomever else rides to the rescue. “In my view, thanking a sponsor is not blight,” Sanders said. “A closed swimming pool on Monday is blight.”
…read the rest! Public/Private Partnerships: Will Commercialization Save Our City Parks? | Ban Billboard Blight.