﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Advertising Will Undo Itself (scenario one)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://antiadvertisingagency.com/news/how-advertising-will-undo-itself-scenario-one/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://antiadvertisingagency.com/news/how-advertising-will-undo-itself-scenario-one</link>
	<description>The Anti-Advertising Agency</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 09:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lisa @ Corporate Babysitter</title>
		<link>http://antiadvertisingagency.com/news/how-advertising-will-undo-itself-scenario-one#comment-38404</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa @ Corporate Babysitter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiadvertisingagency.com/news/how-advertising-will-undo-itself-scenario-one#comment-38404</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I'd love to shift the focus to what we can do. No ideas, beyond not buying and turning off the TV. I guess that's a start.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d love to shift the focus to what we can do. No ideas, beyond not buying and turning off the TV. I guess that&#8217;s a start.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne Elizabeth Moore</title>
		<link>http://antiadvertisingagency.com/news/how-advertising-will-undo-itself-scenario-one#comment-38381</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne Elizabeth Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 19:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiadvertisingagency.com/news/how-advertising-will-undo-itself-scenario-one#comment-38381</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Increased corporate responsibility is one good thing that could come out of this discussion, but another might be an acknowledgment of the sheer volume of advertisements that are allowed to overwhelm all other voices in this "conversation."&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So let's take it to the shareholders, great idea, but let's also shift the focus away from what Unilever can do about it to what, say, we can do. They can always create better ads—I'm having a nightmare vision of the great Axe v. Dove Peace Accord promotional campaign right now—and they will. Because: increased sales. But unless something changes they will also always control the terms of the debate. Not that I know how to change that. . . yet. Ideas?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Increased corporate responsibility is one good thing that could come out of this discussion, but another might be an acknowledgment of the sheer volume of advertisements that are allowed to overwhelm all other voices in this &#8220;conversation.&#8221;</p>

<p>So let&#8217;s take it to the shareholders, great idea, but let&#8217;s also shift the focus away from what Unilever can do about it to what, say, we can do. They can always create better ads—I&#8217;m having a nightmare vision of the great Axe v. Dove Peace Accord promotional campaign right now—and they will. Because: increased sales. But unless something changes they will also always control the terms of the debate. Not that I know how to change that. . . yet. Ideas?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa @ Corporate Babysitter</title>
		<link>http://antiadvertisingagency.com/news/how-advertising-will-undo-itself-scenario-one#comment-38380</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa @ Corporate Babysitter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 18:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiadvertisingagency.com/news/how-advertising-will-undo-itself-scenario-one#comment-38380</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I don't think the conversation is all about Unilever products -- I think it's about corporate responsibility. Unilever is comfortable in their assumption because they don't care. Is it free media attention for them? Maybe. Time to take it to the shareholders.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the conversation is all about Unilever products &#8212; I think it&#8217;s about corporate responsibility. Unilever is comfortable in their assumption because they don&#8217;t care. Is it free media attention for them? Maybe. Time to take it to the shareholders.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.617 seconds -->
