<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Project: Add-Art; replaces online ads with art</title>
	<atom:link href="http://antiadvertisingagency.com/new-project-add-art-replaces-online-ads-with-art/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://antiadvertisingagency.com/new-project-add-art-replaces-online-ads-with-art/</link>
	<description>The Anti-Advertising Agency</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:20:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: river belle</title>
		<link>http://antiadvertisingagency.com/new-project-add-art-replaces-online-ads-with-art/comment-page-1/#comment-46663</link>
		<dc:creator>river belle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 07:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiadvertisingagency.com/?p=546#comment-46663</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Even if they think they paid for it. You can tape tv shows and fast-forward through the commercials – and there’s court cases to back you up). You can flip past the ads in a magazine. You can choose not to see advertising (as long as you’re not in public space) and that’s good.Thanks for sharing posts.
Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if they think they paid for it. You can tape tv shows and fast-forward through the commercials – and there’s court cases to back you up). You can flip past the ads in a magazine. You can choose not to see advertising (as long as you’re not in public space) and that’s good.Thanks for sharing posts.
Regards,</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Lambert</title>
		<link>http://antiadvertisingagency.com/new-project-add-art-replaces-online-ads-with-art/comment-page-1/#comment-44801</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Lambert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 19:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiadvertisingagency.com/?p=546#comment-44801</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@skwhirl - Wladimir Palant, the creator of AdBlockPlad had this to say - &lt;a href=&quot;http://adblockplus.org/blog/ads-dont-generate-money&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ads Don&#039;t Generate Money&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@skwhirl &#8211; Wladimir Palant, the creator of AdBlockPlad had this to say &#8211; <a href="http://adblockplus.org/blog/ads-dont-generate-money" rel="nofollow">Ads Don&#8217;t Generate Money</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skwhirl</title>
		<link>http://antiadvertisingagency.com/new-project-add-art-replaces-online-ads-with-art/comment-page-1/#comment-44800</link>
		<dc:creator>skwhirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 18:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiadvertisingagency.com/?p=546#comment-44800</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t think this is that cool of an idea. Mostly because sites like the NYT or others spend a lot of money in providing content for us. It&#039;s not free to hire reporters and follow stories and host a site - why should we deny them the only way they have to cover their costs?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;d rather look at ads than pay a subscription fee any day - it means I can get more news and info from more places and keeps the flow of information flowing. If I had to pay $10/mo per site I use, I&#039;d only be able to gain access to a few. Now, literally, we have the word at our fingertips for news, view points, information. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Providing content isn&#039;t free, looking at it is because of advertising.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think this is that cool of an idea. Mostly because sites like the NYT or others spend a lot of money in providing content for us. It&#8217;s not free to hire reporters and follow stories and host a site &#8211; why should we deny them the only way they have to cover their costs?</p>

<p>I&#8217;d rather look at ads than pay a subscription fee any day &#8211; it means I can get more news and info from more places and keeps the flow of information flowing. If I had to pay $10/mo per site I use, I&#8217;d only be able to gain access to a few. Now, literally, we have the word at our fingertips for news, view points, information. </p>

<p>Providing content isn&#8217;t free, looking at it is because of advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pope Ratzo</title>
		<link>http://antiadvertisingagency.com/new-project-add-art-replaces-online-ads-with-art/comment-page-1/#comment-43702</link>
		<dc:creator>Pope Ratzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 21:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiadvertisingagency.com/?p=546#comment-43702</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m very impressed with your work.  It&#039;s a positive step towards fighting the ubiquitous advertising that assaults all of us.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This week we heard about a huge economic crisis in the US and the world.  It&#039;s costing us in the US more than a TRILLION DOLLARS to bail out our financial system from the effects of 30 years of Reaganomics.  This happened because everyone from the government on down is buying crap on credit.  The Bush Administration fights TWO WARS on credit and my neighbor buys a 50&quot; television on credit.  Houses, condos on credit, health care on credit, cars on credit.  All because we don&#039;t have enough money due to a war on the middle class and tax cuts for the rich.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is a Class War that we didn&#039;t start, but with people like you, we will finish.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thank you.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m very impressed with your work.  It&#8217;s a positive step towards fighting the ubiquitous advertising that assaults all of us.</p>

<p>This week we heard about a huge economic crisis in the US and the world.  It&#8217;s costing us in the US more than a TRILLION DOLLARS to bail out our financial system from the effects of 30 years of Reaganomics.  This happened because everyone from the government on down is buying crap on credit.  The Bush Administration fights TWO WARS on credit and my neighbor buys a 50&#8243; television on credit.  Houses, condos on credit, health care on credit, cars on credit.  All because we don&#8217;t have enough money due to a war on the middle class and tax cuts for the rich.</p>

<p>This is a Class War that we didn&#8217;t start, but with people like you, we will finish.</p>

<p>Thank you.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amos</title>
		<link>http://antiadvertisingagency.com/new-project-add-art-replaces-online-ads-with-art/comment-page-1/#comment-42121</link>
		<dc:creator>Amos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 17:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiadvertisingagency.com/?p=546#comment-42121</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This is awesome! Go Eyebeam, Go!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think this pro-advertising man is going to have to take some more persuasive viewpoints on a site called anti-advertising agency.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is awesome! Go Eyebeam, Go!</p>

<p>I think this pro-advertising man is going to have to take some more persuasive viewpoints on a site called anti-advertising agency.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Lambert</title>
		<link>http://antiadvertisingagency.com/new-project-add-art-replaces-online-ads-with-art/comment-page-1/#comment-42113</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Lambert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 05:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiadvertisingagency.com/?p=546#comment-42113</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Admiral&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
1. Advertising will come in during the TEXT of what we are reading, or some other more conspicuous and unpleasant location.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This has already happened.  Check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://http://www.adfreeblog.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.adfreeblog.org/&lt;/a&gt; for more.  If it gets worse in the future, we can fight that battle next.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
2.We will have to pay to subscribe to various sites whose advertisers no longer wish to pay to have no one look at their ads.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This also, has already happened. It&#039;s called porn. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
3. [Insert other evils here.]
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Alright, more seriously now:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;1. This add-on could bring about all kinds of things, positive and negative.  And it might not.  We&#039;re speculating.  We could talk about all kinds of things that &lt;em&gt;might&lt;/em&gt; happen, but we don&#039;t know.  The add-on has been out for a week.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;You have rights. You can look at what you want. Marketers don&#039;t own your brain and your eyes, even if they think they paid for it.  You can tape tv shows and fast-forward through the commercials – and there&#039;s court cases to back you up). You can flip past the ads in a magazine.  You can choose not to see advertising (as long as you&#039;re not in public space) and that&#039;s &lt;em&gt;good&lt;/em&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;History has shown that advertising will creep ever further into our lives.  Blaming those who fight back is overlooking those truly responsible.  When you get down to it, your argument is not with me.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Admiral</p>

<blockquote>
1. Advertising will come in during the TEXT of what we are reading, or some other more conspicuous and unpleasant location.
</blockquote>

<p>This has already happened.  Check out <a href="http://http://www.adfreeblog.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.adfreeblog.org/</a> for more.  If it gets worse in the future, we can fight that battle next.  </p>

<blockquote>
2.We will have to pay to subscribe to various sites whose advertisers no longer wish to pay to have no one look at their ads.
</blockquote>

<p>This also, has already happened. It&#8217;s called porn. </p>

<blockquote>
3. [Insert other evils here.]
</blockquote>

<p>Alright, more seriously now:</p>

<p>&lt;</p>

<p>p></p>

<p>1. This add-on could bring about all kinds of things, positive and negative.  And it might not.  We&#8217;re speculating.  We could talk about all kinds of things that <em>might</em> happen, but we don&#8217;t know.  The add-on has been out for a week.</p>

<ol>
<li><p>You have rights. You can look at what you want. Marketers don&#8217;t own your brain and your eyes, even if they think they paid for it.  You can tape tv shows and fast-forward through the commercials – and there&#8217;s court cases to back you up). You can flip past the ads in a magazine.  You can choose not to see advertising (as long as you&#8217;re not in public space) and that&#8217;s <em>good</em>. </p></li>
<li><p>History has shown that advertising will creep ever further into our lives.  Blaming those who fight back is overlooking those truly responsible.  When you get down to it, your argument is not with me.</p></li>
</ol>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steveballmer</title>
		<link>http://antiadvertisingagency.com/new-project-add-art-replaces-online-ads-with-art/comment-page-1/#comment-42097</link>
		<dc:creator>steveballmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 03:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiadvertisingagency.com/?p=546#comment-42097</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;We are pioneering this!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are pioneering this!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Admiral</title>
		<link>http://antiadvertisingagency.com/new-project-add-art-replaces-online-ads-with-art/comment-page-1/#comment-42096</link>
		<dc:creator>Admiral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 18:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiadvertisingagency.com/?p=546#comment-42096</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Look, I definitely am going to download and try this plug-in, but if it successful and many people use it, that just means one of several things will occur:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Advertising will come in during the TEXT of what we are reading, or some other more conspicuous and unpleasant location.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;We will have to pay to subscribe to various sites whose advertisers no longer wish to pay to have no one look at their odds.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;[Insert other evils here.]&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Is this really what you want?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look, I definitely am going to download and try this plug-in, but if it successful and many people use it, that just means one of several things will occur:</p>

<ol>
<li><p>Advertising will come in during the TEXT of what we are reading, or some other more conspicuous and unpleasant location.</p></li>
<li><p>We will have to pay to subscribe to various sites whose advertisers no longer wish to pay to have no one look at their odds.</p></li>
<li><p>[Insert other evils here.]</p></li>
</ol>

<p>Is this really what you want?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Ryan</title>
		<link>http://antiadvertisingagency.com/new-project-add-art-replaces-online-ads-with-art/comment-page-1/#comment-42079</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 19:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiadvertisingagency.com/?p=546#comment-42079</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I really like the idea but I doubt I would actually use it. Call me uncultured. Still one more reason to use firefox. One less reason for PPC.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like the idea but I doubt I would actually use it. Call me uncultured. Still one more reason to use firefox. One less reason for PPC.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

