Submit to the Research Blog
Know of a great article, video, photo to submit to the site? Just completed a project you think should be shared with our readers?
Related Posts
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Michael Mandiberg | Exactly what are you selling me? on Murky(ting) Water
- Michael Mandiberg | Give me my damn three feet! on You Don’t Need It – Stencil
- Michael Mandiberg | Ad Creep: Health Insurers Bribe Users of Facebook’s Mafia Wars on Ad Creep Hits the Bike Lanes
- Michael Mandiberg | Who owns & who controls public space? on James Howard Kunstler on Public Space
- Michael Mandiberg | This makes me angry on More Bad Calls from the NY MTA
-
Most Popular of All-Time
- Oprah, baby, please let me DeTouch you… 25597 view(s)
- …The greatest love of all 8957 view(s)
- New Lauren Greenfield video on NY Times 3503 view(s)
- The Illusionists » Annals of Offensive Advertising: Nikon 3190 view(s)
- You Don’t Need It – Stickers 3118 view(s)
Tag cloud
tv toronto taxes outdoor illegal advertising billboard add-art thingsthatmakeyousayhmmmmm san francisco not creative brands video politics self-loathing prank consumer resistance online grl haha history AAAFFF ads everywhere how to art humor free social marketing nyc public space the law justfollowingorders sticker marketing ad creep aaaproject graffiti branding hack poster los angeles you don't need it greenwashing china chicago bad deals

Clear Channel Messed with LA Weekly and Lost!
by Jill Stewart at the LA Weekly
Recently, reporter Christine Pelisek asked the Los Angeles Department of Building and Safety for a list of all legal and illegal billboards in L.A. – an embarrassing document that will show the public all 11,000 “points of blight” allowed on local streets by City Attorney Rocky Delgadillo, Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and the Los Angeles City Council – in an era when other cities are removing and banning billboards.
Maybe we shouldn’t have been so shocked, given Villaraigosa’s view of what constitutes quality of life, when Building and Safety officials, instead of giving Pelisek this public information, instead alerted Clear Channel and its lawyers that the Weekly had asked City Hall for its billboards list.
That’s right, Villaraigosa’s bureaucrats in Building and Safety actually informed on us to a very big, very aggressive, very rich billboard company. Tattled. Squealed.
This morning, Clear Channel and another huge billboard profiteer, CBS, took the city to Superior Court to stop the cowed bureaucrats over at Building and Safety from even thinking about giving the Weekly the list of existing illegal and legal billboards in L.A.
Clear Channel lost in court today.
When our lawyer, Walt Sadler, and the city’s lawyer, Steve Blau, appeared in court this morning to protest Clear Channel’s effort to squelch this information, Judge James Chalfant quickly made clear that the location and ownership of billboards in L.A. – no matter the endless excuses given in the past by Delgadillo, Villaraigosa and the City Council – is public information gleaned from a public permitting process.
It is not proprietary information, as stratospherically expensive lawyers like Laura Brill from Irell & Manella, representing Clear Channel, like to claim when trying to keep this information from Los Angeles residents. Now, Building and Safety must release the list of 11,000 billboards, their owners and locations. By April 4. Including the thousands of billboards put up illegally by many billboard companies.
This is information that Los Angeles’ dozens of Neighborhood Councils and anti-blight activists have long been waiting for. But Clear Channel has a history of suing to interminably delay fearful City Hall officials from doing the right thing. So stay tuned.
via LA Weekly’s blog